![]() |
| With low back rounded, it can cause back pain |
Here is a great 1 minute clip by one of the worlds leading back pain experts that explains how snow shoveling can be done while sparing your back:
Stu McGill Smart Shovel
Shovel Smart!
![]() |
| With low back rounded, it can cause back pain |
Isn't it a bit ironic that most of us want to improve our flexibility (by stretching), yet we always say that we want to "tighten up" our core. From an athletic perspective, everyone from gymnasts (very flexible) to weightlifters (less flexible) are told to "stay tight" during a given movement. So exists the conundrum of whether to increase or decrease STIFFNESS.
In the body, we can increase stiffness by muscle contraction. As a muscle contracts, it produces force as well as creates compression (bringing the joints closer together). If a joint is more congruent, it will tend to increase stability and its force transmitting capability. Think about the spine as a force transferring structure. The spine is clearly very flexible, and would be more like the rope in the previous example. Its our core muscles that attach to the spine that gently compress and place tension along the spine to increase STIFFNESS so we can transmit force from lower to upper body. It is this type of stiffness that is important from the golf/baseball swing, throwing a ball, flips in gymnastics and lifting weights.
Of course we are trying to stretch our hamstring muscle. We know that the muscle belly is the most extensible part of a complex that includes muscles, tendons and joints. In fact, a muscle belly can stretch up to 10% of its resting length without damaging the muscle tissue. With this being the case, if our hamstring muscle belly was approximately 40cm long, we would only get 4cm stretch out of the actual muscle we are trying to stretch! This is assuming that we are actually able to ONLY stretch the muscle belly.
As mentioned in the answer to question 1, we are stretching a complex of structures including tendons and joints (just to name a few). Not only that, but while we are trying to stretch our hamstrings, we are also stretching a number of structures in our low back as we bend forward. We may be stretching some muscles of the low back, we would also be stretching important ligaments and joint capsules that help with low back stability. Though this may help with overall flexibility, it is detrimental to stability of the low back forcing back and core muscles to work harder to maintain stability. As a side note, we know that people with greater low back flexibility are more prone to pain as they age.
As mentioned, we are stretching a number of structures that have varied extensible properties. Muscles are clearly the most extensible of the bunch with joint capsules, ligaments, and tendons being less extensible. One structure that has gone unmentioned (and frankly is often forgotten) is nerves. Nerve tissue is very tough and not very extensible. So when we stretch our hamstrings, as we pull our toes towards us, we end up stretching nerves (the sciatic nerve and associated branches). In most cases, this is in fact the limiting factor during traditional stretching of hamstrings. An analogy would be like taking an elastic (hamstring) and a rope (nerve) and stretching them as far as they can go. Your stretch would be limited by the rope and not the elastic.
So if the term "no pain, no gain" was taken literally, why don't you see people continually slamming their hand in a door, or repeatedly dropping heavy objects on their foot? It most certainly be painful. It is pretty clear that there is little to gain from the previous two examples.
To go back to the origin of the motto "no pain, no gain" I believe what the aerobics instructors were trying to encourage people to do was to work through some mild discomfort to your cardiovascular and respiratory systems. I hope they weren't encouraging people to work through back and knee pain, but it seems that this is what has become of the famous motto.
So if there is a gym with no machines, what can you do to workout? You can do what they use to do in the old days and actually lift a weight and doing exercises that mimic what you do in sport or life. Doing lifts that include lifting, carrying, pushing, pulling and dragging requires no machines and minimal equipment. Ideally, a gym would have a squat rack (handy for many exercises besides a squat), an olympic bar, some cables (for pulling exercises), some dumbbells, and maybe a few other pieces of fancy equipment such as kettlebells, gym balls and stability boards. With this combination of equipment, you can do a huge variety of exercises.
What about the older people or the people who are new to the gym. Shouldn't they be using machines to introduce them and to teach them how to work out? I would say no way! Why would you teach them bad habits and use machines that only do one thing, when you can start fresh and teach them how to do functional exercises.